Modelling (Un)Bounded Beliefs
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper is concerned with providing a context based logic (language + semantics) for the representation of agents’s beliefs. While different approaches that make use of a single theory have been proposed in order to model agent’s beliefs, such as modal logics, these often suffer from problems, as lack of modularity, logical omniscence, and dissimilarity with implementations. A partial solution to these problems is to distribute the agent’s knowledge into different and separated modules which interact each others. Our approach is to provide these modules, but in the form of (multi) contexts, each one with its own local language and semantics, and to model the relations among modules as compatibility relations among contexts. We extend here this approach to capture important aspects of “ideal” agents, namely their logically omniscent nature, and of “real” agents, namely their non logically omniscent nature due to some resource-boundedness. The logic we use is based on a logic for contextual reasoning, called Local Models Semantics, which allows a (multi) context-based representation of agent’s belief. A tableau system for a simple instance of such a logic is also presented.
منابع مشابه
(Un)Bounded Rationality in Decision Making and Game Theory - Back to Square One?
Game and decision theory start from rather strong premises. Preferences, represented by utilities, beliefs represented by probabilities, common knowledge and symmetric rationality as background assumptions are treated as “given.” A richer language enabling us to capture the process leading to what is “given” seems superior to the stenography of decision making in terms of utility cum probabilit...
متن کاملOn the (Un-)Decidability of Model Checking Resource-Bounded Agents
The verification and modelling of multi-agent systems is an important topic that has attracted much attention in recent years. Resources, however, have only recently been studied as simple extensions to well-known logics. Trying to find a set of useful features while retaining essential properties for practical use, we explore the question: Where are the limits of what can be verified about res...
متن کاملModelling Assumption-Based Reasoning Using Contexts
We propose a two-fold use of context in reasoning about agents. The first concerns the modelling of beliefs which are entertained only within the scope of some assumption. We illustrate this use by describing as logical model of an agent which reasons in a natural deduction style by making assumptions to derive new formulas. The second use of context we propose here concerns the modelling of re...
متن کاملLogics for resource-bounded agents
In this thesis, I criticise traditional epistemic logics based on possible worlds semantics, inspired by Hintikka, as a framework for representing the beliefs and knowledge of agents. The traditional approach suffers from the logical omniscience problem: agents are modelled as knowing all consequences of their knowledge, which is not an admissible assumption when modelling real-world reasoning ...
متن کاملReasoning about Other Agents' Beliefs under Bounded Resources
There exists a considerable body of work on epistemic logics for bounded reasoners where the bound can be time, memory, or the amount of information the reasoners can exchange. In much of this work the epistemic logic is used as a meta-logic to reason about beliefs of the bounded reasoners from an external perspective. In this paper, we present a formal model of a system of bounded reasoners wh...
متن کامل